MAPPS is the only national association of firms in the surveying, spatial data and geographic information systems field in the United States. MAPPS member firms are engaged in surveying, photogrammetry, satellite and airborne remote sensing, aerial photography, hydrography, aerial and satellite image processing, mobile and 3D scanning, GPS and GIS data collection and conversion services. Our associate members include firms that provide products and services to our member firms, as well as other firms world-wide. MAPPS blog posts reflect current issues affecting the private geospatial profession. You can find the same and additional posts on the MAPPS blog.
|

Blog Posts

A bipartisan group of House members has introduced H.R. 3634, the "Federal Prison Industries Competition in Contracting Act of 2011".

Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-MI) offered the bill on December 12 with cosponsors that include Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Barney Frank (D-MA), and Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI).
 
This bill is virtually identical to H.R. 2965, the bill that passed the House in 2006 by a 362-57 vote (Roll no. 443).  MAPPS supported that bill.  A companion bill was approved by a Senate committee, but was not enacted into law.  However, other piecemeal FPI reforms have been put in place by Congress in recent years.

With unemployment continuing at dangerously high levels, 2012 may be the year Congress enacts a bill that has support from Republicans and Democrats, business and labor.
 
Like its predecessor, H.R. 3634 includes two provisions significant to MAPPS.  

First, the bill prohibits agencies from specifying Federal Prison Industries (FPI), or its products, as a source in any Federal agency synopsis/solicitation. There have been incidents where architect-engineer (A/E) contracts have required the A/E firm to specify a FPI product, such as a modular furniture system, in its designs.
 
Most importantly, the bill prohibits FPI and its inmate workers from having access to a variety of geospatial information, about individual citizens’ property or critical infrastructure location.  Specifically, it bans FPI from providing “a service in which an inmate worker has access to personal or financial information about individual private citizens, including information relating to such person’s real property, however described, without giving prior notice to such persons or class of persons to the greatest extent practicable; geographic data regarding the location of surface and subsurface infrastructure providing communications, water and electrical power distribution, pipelines for the distribution of natural gas, bulk petroleum products and other commodities, and other utilities; or data that is classified.” This provision would prohibit FPI from engaging in most, if not all, geospatial activities.
 
With regard to services, the bill eliminated FPI’s status as a preferred source.  A Federal agency can only contract with FPI for services, such as GIS, CAD, scanning, digitizing, if the buying agency’s contracting officers determines FPI’s services meet the agency’s need in a number of criteria, can perform on time, and provides the service at a fair market price.  This eliminates enormous advantages FPI has enjoyed in providing services.  With regard to products, FPI’s previous mandatory source status is ended in favor of full and open competition.
 
The bill also prohibits FPI from providing services in the commercial market.  Although FPI’s original 1930’s enabling law prohibited prison-made products from commercial market entry, the organization secured a legal opinion during the Clinton Administration that said since Congress mentioned products in the 1930’s, and not services, then sale of prisoner provided services must be permitted, notwithstanding that the United States did not have a service economy in the 1930s. Several state attorneys general have issued similar opinions with regard to state prisons.
 
Federal Prison Industries, Inc., which operates under the trade name UNICOR, is a self-supporting, wholly-owned government corporation that employs federal prison inmates.  A program of the Justice Department’s Bureau of Prisons, FPI offers hundreds of products and services, including a number of data conversion activities.
 
A number of state prison industry operations have extensive GIS capabilities, including ColoradoFlorida, and Texas, to name a few.
 
A recent MAPPS legislative issues poll found 51 percent of members continue to view prison industry reform legislation as a very important or somewhat important issue.
 
It has been reported that FPI won a contract from the Corps of Engineers to make signs.  The funding came from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, ARRA, commonly known as the stimulus bill. While the bill was intended to put law-abiding, unemployed Americans back to work, not to support inmates. The expenditure of Federal ARRA funds on prison industries is being investigated by Congress.
 
 
Here is a news story about the bill
 
Under   H.R. 3634, FPI’s Unicor, would be required to submit a detailed analysis of the impact to the private sector before entering into new product markets and would not be able to sell products commercially or internationally; the only customer could be the federal government. It also prohibits agencies from contracting with FPI in which inmates would have access to sensitive or classified information.
 
"This bill gives the taxpayer the greatest value for their hard-earned money by forcing federal agencies to bid for fair and reasonable prices and for products that best suit their needs. The bill preserves market access for these products or services to the hard-working men and women of our districts. This is simply one more easy, common sense way to preserve jobs and help restore economic security for America," Huizenga said.
 
"This legislation will protect the jobs of hard-working American taxpayers while providing valuable alternative rehabilitative opportunities to better prepare inmates for a successful return to society.  It is a workable, bipartisan solution to the problem," Maloney said.
 
"It is time to allow for fair competition for U.S. manufacturers," Frank said.
 
"We should be looking to make government more efficient and cost-effective, and this bill does that. I support this legislation because it will save taxpayer money and open up the contracting process to competition by allowing businesses to bid for these contracts," Sensenbrenner said.
 
Other examples of the industries FPI competes in include: clothing and textiles, electronics, vehicular components and fleet management, industrial products, office furniture, electronics recycling, and services such as call center and data and document conversion.
 
The bill has already gathered interest from a broad coalition of business groups and has a bipartisan list of supporters in Congress from all across America. Original co-sponsors include Reps. Donald Manzullo (R-IL), Edward Royce, (R-CA), Patrick Tiberi (R-OH), and John Olver (D-MA).
 
In the past, studies by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found FPI products and services did not meet agency requirements, were not delivered in atimely manner, and were at times more expensive that the private sector.
Posted by MAPPScomm on Dec 14, 2011 5:08 PM EST
MAPPS joined 44 construction and design groups in a letter (December 7) to President Obama and Congress to pass legislation providing certainty in the construction community.

The letter has three "asks" for the President and Congress.

1. Pass and sign surface transportation, aviation, water resources, and clean water and drinking water infrastructure authorization bills. Enactment of these authorizations will immediately provide programmatic and fiscal certainty that will help job creators in every state put people back to work.

2. Pass and sign appropriations bills for the remainder of fiscal year 2012.  Short-term continuing resolutions provide little or no certainty to public agencies or those who perform work for them. In fact, our members say that the failure to pass routine authorizations and appropriations bills undermines business confidence.

3. Increase public-private partnerships. Any effort to reinvigorate the design and construction markets must successfully jumpstart new privately-funded construction. The strength of the private sector market is the single largest determining factor in the health of the construction industry. The best way to boost private demand for construction is to put in place pro-growth policies that will boost economic expansion.

The coalition posted the ad below in Roll Call, a newspaper focused on Congress, on December 8

.
Posted by MAPPScomm on Dec 14, 2011 4:24 PM EST
Posted by MAPPScomm on Dec 14, 2011 4:24 PM EST
On its face, the LightSquared proposal and the issue of unfair government competition with the private sector would seem to have nothing in common.  As a for-profit corporation, LightSquared is raising private capital, hiring private sector employees, and paying taxes.  At this point, it is seeking a regulatory approval from the federal government (spectrum from the Federal Communications Commission), not tax dollars, grants or other financial assistance from the taxpayers.
 
But LightSquared has stubbed its toe in a way that particularly disadvantages and disenfranchises numerous private companies, and those in surveying and mapping in particular. Unfair government competition with private enterprise is rearing its ugly head again.  Here’s how.
 
Several Federal agencies, including departments of defense, agriculture, transportation, interior and commerce, have voiced concern that LightSquared’s interference with GPS will adversely affect agency operations.  LightSquared argues that the GPS industry, including the surveying and mapping profession, are interfering with LightSquared’s spectrum, not the other way around.
 
That claim notwithstanding, LightSquared has attempted to cushion its impact on existing users – in the government. While reports are the firm has spent more than spent $9 million to develop filters to ensure its signal did not go into the spectrum licensed to GPS, LightSquared says the GPS industry should pay for the filters and patches to their instruments, arguing that the GPS user community should have vacated the disputed spectrum years ago, and is therefore responsible for its own upgrades.
 
Now it is reported that LightSquared has committed an additional $50 million to retrofit or replace GPS devices in use by federal agencies. 
 
This will result in an unfair advantage for the government over the private sector.  Federal agencies, USGS, NOAA, Corps of Engineers, just to name a few that have their own in-house surveying and mapping equipment, crews and service capabilities, would have a no-cost fix to their LightSquared interference problems, while private sector firms, including small business surveyors, photogrammetrists and other GPS users, will have to pay for their own upgrades and repairs.
 
Unfair government competition with the private sector has long been a major concern for small business.  Every time a White House Conference on Small Business has been convened, government performance of commercial activities (those that meet the “Yellow Pages Test” -- if a service is commercially available and can be found from private enterprise in the Yellow Pages, the government shouldn’t be doing it) as a top issue.  LightSquared’s proposal to fix the GPS interference problem for federal agencies while leaving private enterprise to fend for itself will only exacerbate the problem. 
 
Whether an intended or unintended consequence, Congress and the FCC should insist that prior to any approval, LightSquared should be responsible for preventing interference with all GPS users, not just some and certainly not just those in government.
Posted by MAPPScomm on Nov 3, 2011 2:08 PM EDT
The U.S. House of Representatives yesterday voted 405-16 in favor of repealing Section 511 of Public Law No. 109-222, which mandates a requirement that federal, sate and local governments withhold 3 percent of their payments on contracts for goods and services. 

On several occasions MAPPS has urged the IRS to eliminate the 3 percent withholding. 

The bill will now wait for a vote in the Senate before a final approval from President Obama. 

Unlike some more controversial bills that have been passed through the House, this bill has had support by both parties. President Obama had included a delay in the effective date of the withholding in his recently unveiled jobs package.
Posted by MAPPScomm on Oct 28, 2011 10:56 AM EDT

Guest Blogger: Richard Breitlow is an account executive with AGFA Materials Corporation, where he specializes in aerial photography product sales.  He is chairman of the Aerial Acquisition Committee of MAPPS with more than 38 years’ experience in the aerial photography business.

 

Recently, President Obama proposed a Federal debt and deficit reduction plan that includes slower and longer depreciation schedules for business owned aircraft. While billed as eliminating a tax loophole for corporate executives’ jets, the proposal would also adversely affect small businesses, including aerial imagery and geospatial data collection operators. MAPPS has already commented on that proposal.

 

Now the "President’s Plan for Economic Growth and Deficit Reduction" has been released, including a proposed $100 per flight fee for air traffic control services.  This double-whammy on the aerial survey profession is both economically unwise and politically burdensome and unfair.

 

Like other aviation related associations, MAPPS recognizes the need to pay for air traffic control (ATC) services. General aviation has historically paid for those services through fuel taxes, commonly referred to as "pay at the pump". The proposed $100 fee per flight would add a whole new accounting requirement and new level of government bureaucracy just to administer and enforce the new requirement. The best way for general aviation to pay for ATC services is to continue to pay at the pump. Whether the current amount taxed is appropriate, or should be raised is another argument.  Certainly there is a lot of waste in FAA spending that should be eliminated before increases are considered. 

 

The Obama Administration portrayed the proposed fee as a tax on corporate jets. However the actual wording only excludes military aircraft, public aircraft, recreational piston aircraft, air ambulances, aircraft operating outside of controlled airspace, and Canada-to-Canada flights. All aerial survey flights in controlled airspace would be subject to the proposed fee, regardless of aircraft type. MAPPS has gone on record in opposition to per flight air traffic control fees.

 

Adding a $100 fee per flight for ATC services would only further burden a profession already hard-hit by the decline in the housing market, and the economy in general, and would certainly have a negative impact on hiring. This fee would have just the opposite effect of the intent of the President's "jobs bill". 

 

Lobbyists for commercial airlines have long favored measures to shift a larger share of the burden for ATC services to general aviation. However, attempts in the past to include a per flight ATC user fee or "charge" in the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Authorization bill have been met with stiff opposition.

 

The current effort will, and should, meet a similar fate.

 

While the President’s Plan for Economic Growth and Deficit Reduction appears to have little chance of passing Congress, parts of it could find its way into the "Super Committee's" plan to reduce the national debt and annual government deficit. This is where the real danger lies. 

 

 

In order to protect the interests of the aerial survey profession, and the public and clients we serve, I suggest:

  • the current Pay at the Pump method be preserved as the best way for general aviation to help pay for ATC services and the "fee per flight" concept be rejected,
  • Identify “Super Committee” members who are aviation friendly and urge them to either reject the fee outright, or adopt wording to exclude flights that are primarily work operations, such as small businesses operating aircraft for aerial surveys.
  • Identify FAA activities that can be reformed, eliminated or privatized to save money and explore a more balanced and equitable method of paying for FAA and ATC services that does not  unfairly target general aviation generally or aerial survey operations in particular.
Posted by MAPPScomm on Oct 11, 2011 3:47 PM EDT
On September 12 MAPPS Executive Director John Palatiello was one of five witnesses who testified at a public hearing by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) entitled, “Withholding on Payments by Government Entities to Persons Providing Property or Services.” The hearing was to address legislation enacted by Congress calling for a 3 percent withholding on all federal contracts, including mapping, surveying and geospatial activities, with the IRS in charge of implementing regulations on  section 3402(t) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Palatiello reiterated MAPPS opposition to the 3 percent withholding. He said even with a recent change in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (section 52.232-10), A/E firms, including those in surveying and mapping, still face a potential retainage or withholding of 13 percent on Federal contracts, an amount often in excess of the net profit. He said small business cannot afford to be in the banking business, making interest free loans to the federal government. He also said the withholding will drive firms out of the Federal contracting market at a time when we should be encouraging more competition.

As a means to help business, Palatiello urged that all long-term contracts be grandfathered. In particular, an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (ID/IQ) contract should be grandfathered, and the 3%withholding should not apply to any task order entered into or against the ID/IQ contract after the effective date of the IRS regulation.  The same policy should apply to other types of contract vehicles, such as GSA Schedule and Basic Ordering Agreements (BOAs), he told the IRS.

In 2009, MAPPS testified at an IRS oversight hearing opposing 3 percent withholding.

MAPPS is a member of the Government Withholding Coalition (the Coalition), led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The Coalition was formed to seek repeal of Section 511 of Public Law No. 109-222, which mandates the sweeping new requirement that federal, sate and local governments withhold 3% of their payments for goods and services (the government withholding regime).

Currently there is bi-partisan support in Congress to repeal the withholding. H.R. 674 and S. 164 are intended to “amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the imposition of 3 percent withholding on certain payments made to vendors by government entities.” The bills are cosponsored by a bipartisan group of 250 members of the U.S. House of Representatives and 21 U.S. Senators. This legislation is a priority for the Republican leadership in the House and is scheduled to be debated this fall. President Obama has included a delay in the effective date of the withholding in his recently unveiled jobs package.
Posted by MAPPScomm on Sep 14, 2011 4:47 PM EDT
President Obama - and almost every other political figure on the American landscape – has at one time or another declared that small business is the backbone of America’s economy. Then why is the President proposing to raise taxes on the very entrepreneurs he’s counting on to create jobs?

The fact of the matter is most general aviation aircraft is owned by small to mid-sized businesses, not corporate fat cats.  These planes and helicopters are not used to whisk CEO’s off to exotic destinations.  Rather, they are used for aerial photography in support of surveying and mapping of new highways, monitor dangerous encroachment of underground pipelines, conduct danger tree surveys to prevent power outages, apply fertilizer and pesticides to crops for maximum yield of food by farmers, researching the atmosphere and environment, keep an eye on traffic, and move employees, customers, cargo and products.On Monday, President Obama formally sent his “American Jobs Act” to Congress.  As promised in his address to Congress and the Nation last Thursday, the package includes measures to pay for his latest proposal to jump start the American economy. Included in the bill is a provision on “General Aviation Aircraft Treated As 7-Year Property”. That’s tax jargon for the President’s now infamous but inaccurate attack on a tax loophole for corporate jets.
 
The President’s plan is based on polling and focus group sessions that show average Americans frustration with tax loopholes that permit some individuals and businesses to pay little or no taxes. In fact, what is at issue is the length of time a taxpayer is permitted for depreciation of an asset, in this case an airplane. Owners of business aircraft can depreciate their investment over five years. President Obama has proposed changing the depreciation schedule for general aviation aircraft to seven years calling the current five year schedule a tax loophole. The depreciation schedule for general aviation aircraft has been in existence since the early 1980s.  Business aircraft are treated similarly to other assets such as cars, trucks, and certain equipment, which can be depreciated over a five year period when purchased for business use.
 
According to the General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA), in the first six months of 2011, total general aviation airplane shipments worldwide fell 15.5 percent, from 936 in 2010 to 791 this year.  There is no doubt the Obama proposal would only make this situation worse.
 
Shorter depreciation schedules create jobs. The faster a business can expense capital equipment, the faster it can buy more – putting more people to work. Making it difficult for businesses to purchase and depreciate aircraft will not punish wealthy CEO’s, but reduce jobs for the pilots, crews, mechanics, airport operations workers, and ultimately the folks that work the assembly lines at aircraft factories. At a time when application of digital aerial imagery, LIDAR and other airborne acquired geospatial data is exploding, aerial photographers, surveyors, and users of geospatial services will also see their jobs jeopardized.

It is difficult to see how taxing aircraft supports the broader goal of addressing the nation's job crisis. This proposal is virtually identical to what happened in 1990 when Congress imposed a “luxury” tax on yachts. The rich people who could afford these boats were unaffected, but the workers built them lost their jobs. As a result, Congress scrambled to repeal the tax. Pardon the pun, but Congress should not let the plane tax proposal ever get off the ground.
Posted by MAPPScomm on Sep 13, 2011 1:44 PM EDT

GPS is being threatened. An application to the Federal Communications Commission by the firm LightSquared, to gain spectrum access for a planned wholesale 4G LTE (Long Term Evolution) wireless broadband communications network integrated with satellite coverage across the United States, has raised concerns from a broad cross-section of GPS users due to LightSquared’s interference with GPS.

Earlier this year, MAPPS filed a comment with the FCC in opposition to the LightSquared application.

Additionally, MAPPS was active in gaining unanimous approval of the Coalition of Geospatial Organizations (COGO) for a letter in opposition to LightSquared and FGDC or NGAC

An excellent resource for information on this issue is the Coalition to Save Our GPS.

While FCC previously granted LightSquared a conditional waiver, the FCC also directed that LightSquared conduct tests to determine the extent of the interference with GPS.

The Technical Working Group (TWG), which consisted of LightSquared and representatives from the GPS user and manufacturer communities tested more than 100 different GPS devices. The tests, conducte in several test environments, found network deployment proposed by LightSquared would indeed cause interference to millions of GPS users. FCC released the report on June 30 and issued a new call for comments. Such comments are due July 30.

MAPPS has again submitted comments. Individual geospatial professionals, as well as MAPPS member firms, are encouraged to submit comments of their own.

Meanwhile, Congress is moving to prevent FCC approval of the LightSquared application. The appropriations bill to fund the FCC for fiscal year 2012 (which begins October 1, 2011) includes a provision limiting FCC’s funding until it resolves the concerns of possible widespread harmful interference to the GPS system before giving final approval to the application.

Posted by MAPPScomm on Jul 25, 2011 12:50 PM EDT
MAPPS, and its meetings, is like a Jimmy Buffett concert. If you’re not a member, you don’t know what you’re missing. Once you go, you won’t ever want to miss one.

The MAPPS 2011 Summer Meeting, held June 26-30 at the Sagamore Resort in Bolton Landing, N.Y., on Lake George was no exception. The conference was the perfect convergence of all the necessary elements – perfect 80 degree, low humidity weather, a beautiful setting, some 250 enthusiastic geospatial professionals, spouses and children, an outstanding program of business practice, ethics and technical sessions, and enjoyable social activities that enabled attendees to network, share information, and form business-to-business relationships.

The keynote, delivered by former Connecticut Governor John G. Rowland, addressed "Overcoming Adversity and The Arrogance of Power." Rowland (R), a former state legislator and Congressman who set records for gubernatorial election victories in the Nutmeg State, resigned from office and later spent a year in a Federal prison institution for accepting illegal gifts. He counseled MAPPS not to let power, success and selfishness overshadow ethics standards.

General sessions at MAPPS meetings differ from those in other associations insofar as they combine education and information exchanges on the business aspects of a private sector geospatial practice. MAPPS meetings attract senior management of firms – principals, owners, partners and executive professionals – who seek information on technology in order to make return-on-investment decisions.

In a conference session on how geospatial Intelligence (GeoINT) is moving to a cloud computing environment, panelists from leading National Geospatial Intelligence Agency (NGA) contractors gave perspectives on applications from data discovery and sharing, to online processing, GIS Services, visualization, and mobile device applications. The session was followed by a Federal Agency Update, in which Dennis Morgan of NGA and Dr. Joseph Fontanella of the Army Geospatial Center provided updates on their agency activities, contracting opportunities and programs affecting private geospatial firms, including those in GeoINT and cloud computing. Vicki Lucas of USGS updated on initiatives such as The National Map, the National Enhanced Elevation Assessment, or LiDAR initiative, and continuation of the USGS’s optical science laboratory for calibration of analog (film) aerial camera, as well as proposals for digital camera calibration.

For several years, there has been discussion in the community about a "gas tax for geospatial" – a user fee and revolving fund to finance the NSDI and other national programs. In a presentation, “Brother Can You Spare Me a Dime? An Innovative Idea for Financing Government Geospatial Data Activities” a lively discussion developed the concept and offered arguments for and against such an alternative to lobbying for annual appropriations from Congress. The concept was presented by MAPPS Executive Director John Palatiello, followed by comments from each member of the MAPPS Board of Directors and an open discussion among members. Based on the members’ response, MAPPS will continue to explore the user fee and revolving fund concept, as well as alternate methods of financing national government data requirements.

A session on “Turning University Competition into Cooperation” explored unfair competition with the private sector by universities performing geospatial production contracts with little or no research or education component, and ways private firms can partner with post-secondary schools for mutual benefit.

Taking advantage of holding the meeting in New York, just an hour’s drive north of the state capitol Albany, MAPPS hosted Bill Johnson, New York State GIS coordinator and a past president of NSGIC, who spoke on “GIS from a State Coordinator's Perspective,” focusing on security, emergency response, broadband and other statewide uses for GIS.

The FAA and private firms debated whether UAV's are a threat or opportunity for private aerial acquisition firms. MAPPS members heard from a new entrepreneurial startup acquiring imagery using a small UAV platform, learned about recent testing of a UAV mapping system, and received an update on FAA's activities related to UAV regulations and the process for authorizing commercial unmanned aerial vehicles in the United States.

Business sessions included social media for marketing, mergers and acquisitions, and how to implement and stick to a strategic business plan. In the latter session, both large and small firm principals and owners who have developed and implemented successful strategic planning shared their experiences in developing and implementing plans, discussed how to stay on the road map while avoiding detours, and the benefits of having a written plan.

Technical and marketing sessions included data verification, validation, and QA/QC, including off-the-shelf tools and third-party services, while a “The Need for Immersive LiDAR Standards” was the continuation of several previous MAPPS sessions on mobile mapping systems and static (tripod mounted) LiDAR systems, with this forum exploring educating the end user on the true capabilities of these platforms, what role accuracy plays in decisions on technology employment, and what practices should be employed to determine the right tool for the project. A presentation on the National Broadband Mapping Program provided the status and business opportunities for surveying and mapping firms in mapping where broadband service exists and is yet to be deployed, as well in the design and construction of new infrastructure. It was reported that hundreds of millions of dollars in Federal funds are still to be expended for universal broadband, creating potential contracts for location services. The session also identified the extent to which American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (AAR), or stimulus, funds were used to fund government and university competition with the private sector. It was reported that only about one-third of funds went to firms for private sector job creation or preservation.

MAPPS members also received an update on federal legislation affecting the geospatial profession, including news that the House Appropriations Committee has withheld Federal Communications Commission (FCC) funding to approve a spectrum application by the company LightSquared that would interfere with GPS signals. It was also reported that a Senate version of the Federal Land Asset Inventory reform (FLAIR) Act has been recently introduced, the House has passed three provisions limiting insourcing and encouraging contracting out to the private sector, FEMA flood mapping reform legislation containing provisions beneficial to the surveying and mapping profession is working its way through Congress, federal geospatial governance and coordination reform legislation will soon be introduced, privacy limits on precise geolocation data are still under consideration in the House and Senate, although the Federal Trade Commission has conceded its proposed rules must be revised to avoid unintended consequences for mapping and geospatial activities, and legislation banning certain LiDAR operations as "laser pointers", subject to criminal prosecution, when used near aircraft or airports is being addressed in Congress and at the FAA by MAPPS.

PowerPoint presentations from the conference are available to MAPPS members in the members-only section of the MAPPS website, www.mapps.org. For additional information and a MAPPS membership application, go to www.mapps.org.
Posted by MAPPScomm on Jul 11, 2011 11:05 AM EDT
< Prev    1 2   

Note: The views expressed in the blogs and associated comments are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect those of POB.

Most Recent Blog Posts

In my last post, I setup my ideal organization into Production, Management, and Consulting divisions. Each segment can exist as a business in its own right and I will detail my ideal methods for dealing with each in their separate posts. The first one to be addressed is where everything starts: Production. Ever since its inception, surveyors have... more...
Posted by Andrew Gaiennie on Cyborg Surveying and You Feb 20, 2012 9:44 PM EST
This year the 53rd Annual New York State Association of Professional Land Surveyors held their conference in the beautiful city of Saratoga Springs, NY.  A stroll down Broadway Avenue transports you back in time as downtown enthralls you with its snowy historic architectural locale. more...
Posted by Darron Pustam on The Data Czar Jan 16, 2012 2:30 PM EST
Loading...

Search Blogs

Recent Comments

It is interesting that inmates handling geospatial information only became a "concern" when the job market went so...
Raising taxes of any kind has become a political football that gets kicked around. The United States happens to be on...
Aircraft especially general aviation aircraft DO NOT DEPRECIATE in value, much. Furthermore most companies leas...
This is another desparate attempt by the administration to increase revenues at a time when they should be cutting s...
"The fact of the matter is most general aviation aircraft is owned by small to mid-sized businesses... they are used...

advertise